Mass scale
\(r_s\) has units of length; \(x\) is the dimensionless areal radius.
A formula is shown only with its variables, units, assumptions and failure modes. Display mathematics follows the clear card system of the original research dashboard while preserving accessible source text.
\(r_s\) has units of length; \(x\) is the dimensionless areal radius.
The bridge is derivative-matched through second order.
These are derived from \(\Xi\), not independently fitted functions.
The coordinate \(r\) is areal: symmetry spheres have area \(4\pi r^2\).
Emitter, observer and kinematic terms must be stated.
These terms diagnose the present diagonal extrapolation. They do not decide whether a separately derived SSZ inner solution or boundary geometry can be regular.
These authored notes are kept beside the six canonical equations and the dual-velocity closure. They distinguish definition, interpretation, domain and verification so the automatic catalogue cannot silently replace context with a generic sentence.
\(r_s=2GM/c^2\) fixes the length scale and \(x=r/r_s\) removes units from the radial coordinate.
Compute \(r_s\) from the declared mass and constants, then divide \(r\) by \(r_s\).
\(r_s\) has length units; \(x\) is dimensionless. This does not by itself define a metric.
Dimensional and limit checks validate the normalization, not an independent physical claim.
The inner, quintic bridge and outer branches define one locked field over their stated \(x\)-ranges.
Select the branch by \(x\); use the rescaled argument in the middle branch.
The two junctions delimit the bridge. Second-order matching means value, first derivative and second derivative agree at both joins.
Symbolic derivative identities test the bridge; they do not prove a different interior continuation is regular.
\(D\), \(A\) and \(B\) are derived from one field \(\Xi\), with \(AB=1\) as an algebraic identity.
Evaluate \(D=(1+\Xi)^{-1}\), then square and invert the square.
The definition requires \(1+\Xi\ne0\). These are ansatz factors, not separately fitted observables.
Algebraic, dimensional and regression tests establish the declared chain only.
The line element specifies the current static, spherically symmetric diagonal geometry.
The first term is temporal, the second radial, and the final two terms describe the areal two-sphere.
\(r\) is areal because spheres have area \(4\pi r^2\); \(D\) is the declared field-derived factor.
Signature, tensor, curvature and limit checks test this ansatz within its declared scope.
The relation converts coordinate time to proper time and compares static emitter and observer clocks.
Evaluate \(D\) at \(r_o\) and \(r_e\); their ratio gives the displayed static redshift factor.
Both worldlines are assumed static. Motion and Doppler contributions are outside this equation.
Units and weak-field limits are checkable; the ratio is not a complete test of the spacetime model.
The limits record the coefficient and curvature scaling of the current diagonal extrapolation.
\(A\) tends to a finite value while \(R\) and \(K\) scale as inverse powers of \(r\).
The statement concerns the displayed branch and its declared curvature invariants, not every possible interior.
Symbolic curvature and asymptotic checks validate this expansion only.
The reciprocal escape and infall scales multiply to \(c^2\) by construction.
Multiply the square roots and cancel \(r_s/r\) against \(r/r_s\).
\(v_{\rm fall}\) is a reciprocal kinematic scale, not a locally measured superluminal three-velocity.
The product identity is exact within this parametrisation and does not assert superluminal propagation.
Coordinate range, branch, approximation order and observer class.
Units of every symbol and a consistent dimensional check.
Definition, mathematical consequence, implementation, test or empirical comparison.
vfall is a reciprocal kinematic scale, not a locally measured superluminal 3-velocity. See the interactive Metric tab.
The conclusion that does not follow from the equation or its software test.
Search the full reviewed catalogue across geometry, regimes, local frames, geodesics, observables, energy conditions, statistics, weak field, strong field and validation. Automatically extracted candidates remain separate.
Loading reviewed formulas…
This page separates the declared definition, its computation or visualisation, the evidence supporting it, and the conclusions that remain outside its scope.
Start with the formula or control, identify its domain and inputs, then follow the linked implementation and evidence record.
A passing identity, numerical limit, plot or comparison supports only the stated relation under its recorded assumptions and provenance.
It is not automatically an independent experiment, a complete physical theory, or a proof beyond the explicit claim boundary.
The portal keeps current canonical locks above historical descriptions and keeps software verification separate from empirical confirmation.
Use the current P0, JIF or mathematical lock for the formula and domain shown on this page.
Read tests, convergence, reference compatibility, dataset-conditioned comparisons and independent replication as different evidence classes.
Every result retains its assumptions, limits and explicit non-claim so a visual or passing assertion is not over-promoted.